home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
073090
/
0730108.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-03-25
|
4KB
|
95 lines
<text id=90TT1992>
<title>
July 30, 1990: Durenberger's Comedown. . .
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1990
July 30, 1990 Mr. Germany
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
NATION, Page 19
Durenberger's Comedown...</hdr>
<body>
<p>The Senate ethics committee recommends tough sanctions against
a rules-bending lawmaker
</p>
<p>By Margaret Carlson/Washington--Reported by Barbara
Dolan/Chicago and Hays Gorey/Washington
</p>
<p> The disintegration of a public man entered its final stages
last week when the Senate ethics committee recommended that the
full Senate publicly denounce Minnesota Republican David
Durenberger, 55, who occupies the seat once held by Hubert
Humphrey and at one time looked as though he might be worthy
of it. The panel's three Democrats and three Republicans
accused the Senator of knowingly engaging in reprehensible
conduct that was "clearly and unequivocally unethical." They
also recommended that Durenberger be required to pay to charity
the $95,000 he received in excess of allowable speaking fees
and another $29,000 he pocketed by charging the government rent
for staying in a Minneapolis condominium that he owned. Only
expulsion, which the ethics committee last recommended in 1981
for New Jersey Democrat Harrison Williams for his part in the
Abscam scandal, would have been more severe.
</p>
<p> After the verdict, Durenberger, his face creased by grief,
declared, "I am sorry," and promised to give back the money as
a "tangible sign of regret." At the same time, he pledged to
spend the remaining four years of his current term "being the
best Senator I can," showing that he may not yet grasp the
gravity of his offenses. While the Senate Republican Conference
could have stripped Durenberger of seniority rights and
committee assignments, chairman John Chafee is reluctant to do
so.
</p>
<p> But Minnesotans may demand more of a man they voted to high
office than a simple act of contrition and a refund. Bill
Morris, former chairman of the state's Independent-Republican
party, summed up the dismay: "I think Minnesota now has 1 1/2
Senators...I think most of us voted for him to serve
millions--not make them." Some G.O.P. officials are urging
Durenberger to step down by July 31 so that a special election
could be held in November. Durenberger could then seek a vote
of confidence by running in that race.
</p>
<p> Durenberger's golden life began to unravel in 1970, when his
first wife died of cancer at 31. With four sons to raise, the
eldest only seven, he remarried within a year. Two of his sons
developed drug problems, and in 1985 he and his wife
temporarily separated and he sought solace in a Christian
retreat in a Washington suburb. Rumors that he was having an
affair with a 28-year-old secretary were exacerbated when a
woman he was with at National Airport screamed that Durenberger
had "ruined" her life and knocked him to the floor with her
purse. After that incident, Durenberger began giving interviews
in Phil Donahue-speak, complaining that he was going through
a mid-life crisis and did not love himself enough.
</p>
<p> Like so many who breathe the intoxicating air of power,
Durenberger thought he could get away with bending the rules.
Limits on speaking fees? Launder the money by counting excess
payments as book-promotion fees. Trips to a marriage counselor
in Boston too expensive? Arrange business lunches and collect
honorariums. Need some extra income? Bill the government rent
for staying in a condominium you own. Not until after the
committee issued its recommendation did Durenberger concede
that "I have made serious mistakes. I acknowledge them and
accept full responsibility."
</p>
<p> Before its Aug. 3 recess, the full Senate is almost certain
to follow the ethics committee recommendation and denounce
Durenberger for bringing the chamber into "dishonor and
disrepute." Durenberger may feel that by enduring a moment of
shame and making restitution he puts things right with the
world and deserves to retain a place of honor in it. If so, he
is ignoring an elementary principle of political morality:
those who make the laws are not above them.
</p>
</body>
</article>
</text>